Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semmes Motor Company
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 22:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Semmes Motor Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Complete lack of notability. Qwirkle (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Dealerships are not notable (by default, at least). The references are just routine coverage and advertisements. May also want to consider starting a discussion for Semmes Motors, Inc.. Waddles 🗩 🖉 15:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe. The court case there seems to have had real effects though. Qwirkle (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for being vigilant. However, please check Commonscat:Semmes Motor Company, before coming to overzealous conclusions. Please keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Commons is not an indicator of notability; there are plenty of unused logos and other images that are not used. This may exist in picture but not may necessarily satisfy our GNG and/or SNG. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Being a total solution provider for "painting, trimming and repairing of delivery trucks" is more similar to a modern car tuning company, i.e. a car manufacturer or systems integrator like Westfalia-Werke, instead of a modern dealership. This article reflects this, and should therefore please be kept, without implying that this would be a precedence to upload an article on each dealership such as Semmes Motors, Inc. (which is only notable because of the court case). NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- WP:OR at its most blatant…and quite likely wrong, to boot. Qwirkle (talk) 15:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Being a total solution provider for "painting, trimming and repairing of delivery trucks" is more similar to a modern car tuning company, i.e. a car manufacturer or systems integrator like Westfalia-Werke, instead of a modern dealership. This article reflects this, and should therefore please be kept, without implying that this would be a precedence to upload an article on each dealership such as Semmes Motors, Inc. (which is only notable because of the court case). NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Commons is not an indicator of notability; there are plenty of unused logos and other images that are not used. This may exist in picture but not may necessarily satisfy our GNG and/or SNG. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for being vigilant. However, please check Commonscat:Semmes Motor Company, before coming to overzealous conclusions. Please keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as not at all notable. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 04:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.